Le Québec est en plein délire collectif, selon Guy Bertrand
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c310e/c310e44799bcf49a5ee5357cff6f93129abf1356" alt="Main image"
L'équipe Droit-Inc
2017-02-06 14:45:00
Il estime que les médias traditionnels, les experts, les chercheurs de tout acabit et surtout, les politiciens, ont créé « un faux sentiment de culpabilité collective et de honte fondés sur le racisme, la xénophobie, l’islamophobie et la haine de l’autre, quand ce n'est pas le nationalisme, l'identité, les accommodements raisonnables, l'immigration et la langue...»
« Messieurs Trudeau, Couillard, Coderre et Labeaume, demande-t-il, comment et pourquoi en êtes-vous arrivés tous ensemble à instrumentaliser le drame survenu à la mosquée de Sainte-Foy? »
Regardez-le par vous-mêmes!
Santiago
il y a 8 ansA broken clock is always right two times a day!
Anonyme
il y a 8 ansHe did hit bullseye here. This is a typical lunatic case far from representing anything larger. It's lame to make politics out of this.
And kudos to Me Bertrand for blowing against the wind. He's not going to get applause at Tout le monde en parle.
DSG
il y a 8 ansThese would be powerful messages, if it wasn't for the fact that no one listens to him anymore. He has changed his mind so much on separatism, that he has lost all credibility. He once was a staunch separatist who ran for the leadership of the PQ, then changed his mind when he saw the outpouring of love from English Canada when Lucien Bouchard lost his leg. He even appeared at the Supreme Court succession hearings (on the federalist side, or both sides simultaneously, I don't remember). Then he wrote a book claiming that separatism is the only hope for the survival of Quebec. I can only guess that he came to that conclusion one morning when the image of the Virgin Mary appeared on his toast. He then claimed that Montreal would again host the Olympics and a world's fair in the same year. His ideas are out there, like for real.
Aanonyme
il y a 8 ansUn avocat qui a tenu des props haineux devant la Cour suprême lorsqu'il défendait un client qui avait tenu des propos haineux: Mugesera c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration), [2005] 2 RCS 91, 2005 CSC 39 (CanLII), <[http://canlii.ca/t/1l247]>. Pas surprenant qu'il ne voit pas le problème de la vilification d'une minorité.